‘Everyone interfaces’: coding access to the digital welfare state
Meers, J. (2026), ”Everyone interfaces’: coding access to the digital welfare state’, Legal Studies 46(2) 292-317.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2026.10128
Abstract
User interfaces – on the web, standalone apps, or internal systems – are now central to the design and operation of the welfare state, with profound implications for access to legal entitlements and the exercise of administrative discretion. While socio-legal scholars have begun to examine how interfaces mediate state-citizen relations, research has been constrained by limited access to these systems. This paper applies a novel socio-legal methodology to analyse prototypes developed by software engineers working in the UK’s welfare administration by drawing on the Department for Work and Pensions’ (DWP) GitHub account – a platform where the DWP’s digital team stores, manages, and shares code on an almost daily basis across more than 500 repositories. By analysing this code, this paper moves beyond the handful of public-facing examples that have dominated scholarship to date to present a new account of how digital interfaces mediate access to legal entitlements. The analysis reveals three interlinking patterns: (i) ‘happy path’ processing that assumes ideal user journeys; (ii) prompting and priming mechanisms that shape decision-making; and (iii) interfaces designed specifically for official workforce management and control. This paper argues that these findings have significant implications for socio-legal analyses of public services and administrative justice in digital contexts.
In a nutshell
Almost every interaction with the benefits system now runs through a screen, and the civil servants who design those screens have attracted very little legal scrutiny. The Department for Work and Pensions publishes hundreds of code repositories on GitHub. This paper draws on the hundred most recently updated of them, downloaded and run locally so that the prototype interfaces could be used much as a claimant or a caseworker would use them.
Three design patterns run through the sample. Interfaces prompt and prime the people using them, offering officials sample text that steers how a benefit appeal is answered. They are built around what developers call the ‘happy path’, the straightforward case, with complicated circumstances accommodated later or not at all. Officials are managed through the same interfaces, which display processing times and set one caseworker’s output against another’s.
Design choices of this kind shape access to legal entitlement as firmly as any rule, and they are made largely out of view.
Read the paper
Suggested citation
Meers, J. (2026), ”Everyone interfaces’: coding access to the digital welfare state’, Legal Studies 46(2) 292-317. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2026.10128